Does Self-Reported Posttraumatic Growth Reflect Genuine Positive Change?
self-reported posttraumatic growth, genuine positive change
In this study, we evaluated the validity of selfreported posttraumatic growth (PTG) by assessing the relation between perceived growth and actual growth from pre- to posttrauma. Undergraduate students completed measures tapping typical PTG domains at Time 1 and Time 2 (2 months later). We compared change in those measures with scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996) for those participants who reported a traumatic event between Time 1 and Time 2 (n 5 122). PTGI scores generally were unrelated to actual growth in PTG-related domains. Moreover, perceived growth was associated with increased distress from pre- to posttrauma, whereas actual growth was related to decreased distress, a pattern suggesting that perceived and actual growth reflect different processes. Finally, perceived (but not actual) growth was related to positive reinterpretation coping. Thus, the PTGI, and perhaps other retrospective measures, does not appear to measure actual pre- to posttrauma change.
Frazier, Patricia; Tennen, Howard; Margaret, Gavian; Park, Crystal; Tomich, Patricia L.; and Tashiro, Ty (2009). Does Self-Reported Posttraumatic Growth Reflect Genuine Positive Change?. Psychological Science 20(7), 912-919. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02381.x Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.kent.edu/psycpubs/75