Title

Ex Post Facto IRB Review: Two Practical Hurdles, One Conceptual Mistake.

Publication Title

American Philosophical Association Newsletter on philosophy and medicine

Publication Date

Fall 2003

Document Type

Article

Keywords

biomedical and behavioral research, ethical review, "ethics committees, research", human experimentation, humans, informed consent, risk assessment, time factors

Disciplines

Other Philosophy | Philosophy

Abstract

Considers three problems that result when research is presented to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) after the work has been completed. Frequency of researchers' failure to obtain IRB review; Qualification for the IRB approval; Regulatory context for ex post facto review.

This document is currently not available here.


Share

COinS